Isis, another dilemma my friends

Isis has killed 2 Americans, 1 British and 1 Frenchman using the inhumane method of beheading. These atrocious acts fired up the world.
Fired up enough to gain bipartisan support in the U.S. Support for arming some other potential terrorists in an effort to eliminate these nasty dudes and the imaginary threat to the U.S. Did I say bipartisan support? Yes I did, just wanted to repeat it so we totally grasp this amazing event. Almost reminds me of when we invaded Iraq with enthusiastic support of flag waving American patriots.
Now back on point.
One of our allies in this effort, Saudi Arabia, beheads criminals as a standard practice in criminal punishment. Some of these beheadings are for crimes that would not be considered for death penalty punishment based on U.S. standards. This of course creates the dilemma, how can we condemn these acts when they are being performed on a regular basis by our allies?
And to further confuse the situation we have to wonder if executions in the U.S. are to be considered humane. Or France’s use of the guillotine for executions as late as 1977. You know, killing a human by different methods does get the same results, they all end up dead.
Tell me now my friends, why the angst and volatile reaction over the beheadings?
We must also take into consideration that we are now aiding Syria’s dictator Assad. A man we wanted out less than one year ago.
Tell me also why we are doing this.
You don’t think it has anything to do with the military-industrial complex and the complicity of the main stream media do you?